In Luke 10 a Lawyer confronts Jesus. The matter of the confrontation will not be addressed here because that’s not my point. My point is how Jesus attempts to answer this smart guy’s question. He starts off with two questions of His own.
1) What is written in the law? The first way to answer a challenge to your faith is to ask the other person what scripture says. If they don’t know what scripture says, or if you don’t for that matter, there will never be a solid resolution.
2) How readest thou? Now that Jesus has pointed smart guy’s brain to the scripture, He then asks how the guy reads it. Just because the Bible says something doesn’t mean people read it that way! These two questions should be the foundation to the beginning of any answer in a doctrinal disagreement.
Knowing the answer to these two questions will aid in coming to a good conclusion. However, even Jesus had trouble with this guy. After answering that he should love his neighbor, lawyer man decides to justify himself or excuse himself by asking who his neighbor is.
The third step to coming to a conclusion is to eliminate justifications. Often, even though we know what the Bible says and we have even read it right, we still don’t want to do it.
With these three steps in mind, you can have a fine conversation with someone, or at least know that any further conversation is going to be a colossal waste of time and energy. Cutting to the point is the object. These three steps cut well.