Yesterday I talked about being humble in our opinions whether we are scientific, religious, or both, or neither. Not everyone knows everything.
At the same time, some people do know some things! We’re not floating around in an incomprehensible void of mush. Some things can be known.
Science can help us know many things, but not all things. The Bible can help us know many things, but not all things. I think both have their place and the person who embraces both will know more than the one who embraces only one or neither.
But humility is key. The fear of God is the beginning of wisdom. Being humble is how learning starts.
Some people are right and some are wrong. There are times when the person who is right needs to correct the person who is wrong, but that correction must be humble too.
Here is a recent conversation I had on the internet, which did not involve me desiring to be in any argument. The question I responded to was asked by a non-Calvinist on his non-Calvinist web site. Here is his question:
What are the potential effects of teaching the Calvinistic claim that if God wants you then He will make you want Him?
Here is my answer:
Then God doesn’t want everyone, eliminates God being good & not a respecter of persons, Christ not a propitiation for sins of the world etc
Not bad for 140 characters! Of course, being the internet, it devolved into an argument. Here is the flow of what ensued.
ANONYMOUS INTERNET ARGUER: Eliminates God being good????? Even if He chose to not save anyone at all He would still be good! He owes us no mercy!!
ME: You are defending the point that being unmerciful would be consistent with being good?
AIA: Yes because He is God and doesn’t HAVE to be merciful. He is good to give justice. Is He not good to give justice to unbelievers? That’s what mercy is!! Exodus 33:19 Titus 3:5
He doesn’t owe anyone mercy. He could damn us all to hell like we deserve. He would still be good. Sorry you have a poor view of Him.
ME: I’m aware of what mercy is. Your point is that God can still be good if He were unmerciful and I disagree.
AIA: God is not unmerciful……He does however withhold His mercy from some….He is still good though.
ME: thank you for making my point. Been a pleasure.
The conversation was dropped here, much to my surprise. I can only assume it’s because the Calvinist at hand was not male.
Now, I have a certain amount of pride in posting this. I think I have a very legitimate point and I think I made it well without going into personal attacks and diversions. I stuck to the original point and I think I made it.
AIA’s point is that God is good, therefore, everything He does is inherently good. So, even if God did something that wasn’t good–if He were always unmerciful–He would still be good. Therefore, His hypothetical mercilessness would be good.
This is very bad logic. This rips the word “good” right out of any common-sensical meaning. In order for someone to be good, someone else must be able to recognize the goodness.
God is good, which is why He’s merciful; and God is merciful, which is why God is good. It’s not like one came before the other.
To claim you are good means you do things that are good in and of themselves. Saying you are good, and then doing all manner of bad things, and yet claiming your bad things still define good, is arbitrary and not very orderly. Language falls apart at that point. Words don’t mean anything, so we might as well figglemunch dasser wooblesnouse.
I believe I am right. I believe I am right based on scripture, logic, and word etymology.
I believe I am right based on the arguments against me. The main issue is not addressed, but verse references are given about mercy that don’t touch on the pivotal point at hand, points that are not essential to the debate are brought up, and then there’s this nugget, “Sorry you have a poor view of Him.”
Anytime such responses are used, you know you’re on to something. I ignored it and went back to the original point.
Again, I’m showing this to you so you can see what flawless arguing looks like. I nailed it! Notice my “Been a pleasure!” At the end? That is one sarcastic “!”! I am now an arrogant jerk bragging about my awesomeness to others, thus showing I did not argue out of love, but rather to show intellectual superiority and frustration with non-sensical Calvinist reasoning.
Knowledge puffs up. That’s what it does. I don’t know how to beat it. I just know it when I sees it. I seens it big time. Good luck out there. Stay humble, my friends.